A PRESIDENT IN DISTRESS- PRESIDENT OBAMA AND KERRY - “SELLING
A FANTASY….. ……THAT WE’RE NOT BUYING”! – PART # 1
I AM SO VERY OPPOSED TO THE IDEA OF ANY IRAN NUCLEAR DEAL- for
me, its give up your “nuclear ambitions” or else!.... as they themselves have
on numerous occasions in the past defied the IAEA and international laws and
standards that were given to them to adhere to, and yet the Democrats and the
Obama Administration seems to think they will abide by the treaty in which Obama
has set forth. As I sat and watched the live speech which was held at the American
University on August 5th 2016, President Obama trying to “sell” the
ideas and the positive aspects of the Unconstitutional Nuclear deal [treaty]
with Iran. To be honest, it was the “first” time that I could agree with a few
major points of President Obama….. [IF] in the past Iran has not defied any and
all standards that were set forth, but they have whenever they had the chance
to do so, and Iran has proven that time and time again, and not to mention they
are the largest state sponsor of terrorism. I do however understand the president’s
position that he faces, but I strongly believe he has taken the wrongful approach
in trying to accomplish that goal.
THE NEWEST OF SUCH AN ARGUMENT THAT I HAVE IS THIS- The newest Classified satellite images
obtained by US government sources show that Iran has now dispatched bulldozers
and heavy machinery to its Parchin nuclear complex, that the U.S. has pictures
of from 2012, strongly suggesting it is cleaning up the site prior to
inspections by the IAEA International
Atomic Energy Agency this fall! Congress has not set forth its pen to allow the
treaty to pass or to be declined and yet Iran is already “cleaning up” areas!
What will they do with the Nuclear junk they are trying to clean?? Do you Kerry
and Obama really believe they will trash it all?? Or- position it in a new area
unknown by the U.S. or the IAEA! Who are we trying to fool here is the question
that I have.
The evidence, which was obtained in July, was presented to
US lawmakers last week, and on Monday the Office of the Director of National
Intelligence met with politicians to explain its significance, Bloomberg News reported
Wednesday. Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr said the
evidence posed challenges to upcoming IAEA inspections of the Parchin military
complex, a site suspected of being used for experiments related to
weaponization of Iran’s nuclear technology.
Details of inspections of the site were reportedly specified
in an IAEA-Iran agreement to which the US was not privy, but the head of Iran’s
atomic agency “denied the existence” of such an agreement last month.
US government officials were split on the significance of
the evidence, according to the Bloomberg report; some saw it as a possible
breach of the nuclear deal reached last month, while others said it would not
interfere with inspections.
“I think it’s up to the administration to draw their
conclusions. Hopefully this is something they will speak on, since it is in
many ways verified by commercial imagery. And their actions seem to be against
the grain of the agreement,” Burr told Bloomberg News.
Burr added that the evidence could mean that inspectors
would not see the site as it had existed prior to the suspected cleanups,
calling it “a huge concern.”
A senior intelligence official said that while he was aware
of Iran’s “sanitized efforts” since the Vienna deal was signed, he believed
the IAEA team would still be able to properly inspect the site and detect past
nuclear work.
Another administration official added that the October 15
inspection deadline did not leave enough time for Iran to clean up all traces
of enriched uranium, if that was indeed the work being done there.
Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Bob Corker said
that although he found the evidence disconcerting, it may not constitute a
violation of the nuclear deal.
“The intelligence briefing was troubling to me … some of the
things that are happening, especially happening in such a blatant way,” he
said. “Iran is going to know that we know.”
David Albright, president of the Institute for Science and
International Security, said that the activity may be “Iran’s last-ditch effort
to eradicate evidence there.”
“The day is coming when they are going to have to let the
IAEA into Parchin, so they may be desperate to finish sanitizing the site,” he
added.
IN PRESIDENT OBAMA’S SPEECH HE SAID “Between now and the congressional
vote in September, you are going to hear a lot of arguments against this deal,
backed by tens of millions of dollars in advertising”… but myself as well as
others are not spending a dime- only our time to put out the truth and the
fears that the Iran nuclear deal could make happen in reality.
Obama went on to say “if the rhetoric in these ads and the
accompanying commentary sounds familiar, it should, for many of the same people
who argued for the war in Iraq are now making the case against the Iran nuclear
deal.” But Obama forgets what has happened In the last 35 years with Iran
and even by pulling the troops out has made ISIS grow to be what they are
today! By the way… speaking of ISIS, Iran only wants to fight against ISIS
because they are worried that ISIS will take their territory… they don’t want
that!
THE DEMOCRATIC OBAMA MENTIONED THAT THE WAR IN IRAQ as “It
was a mindset characterized by a preference for military action over diplomacy,
a mindset that put a premium on unilateral US action over the painstaking work
of building international consensus, a mindset that exaggerated threats beyond
what the intelligence supported. First of all…. The difference of
Republicans Vs Democrats is just this- Democrats want always to use “Diplomacy”
rather than the Military…. Whereas Republicans want to use “overwhelming
military force” when need be, meaning to say… that “diplomacy doesn’t always
work Obama!
AS TO DOWNPLAYING MILITARY THREATS it has been seen that even
in the recent year and a half President Obama and Kerry have in fact DOWNPLAYED
the actual threats against America, American assets and Americans in general
anywhere in the world and by “cutting the military” would not help us to deter
any threats that may come our way, if anything we need more military personnel
rather than to disassemble them.
On Tuesday, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee heard
testimony from Amb. Robert G. Joseph Ph.D, currently Senior Scholar at the
National Institute for Public Policy, formerly Under Secretary of State for
Arms Control and International Security, and the person who in 2003 led the
nuclear negotiations with Libya. He testified the Iran deal is a “bad
agreement” with “five fatal flaws”: (1) it does not effectively detect cheating
unless Iran decides to do it openly, and Iran is more likely to cheat at
military bases where it has cheated in the past and has ruled out inspections
in the future; (2) it leaves a large‐scale nuclear infrastructure in place that
could be used to break out, or more likely “sneak‐out,” and then permits a
significantly expanded program with a “virtually zero” breakout time; (3) it
has “snap‐back” provisions that are illusory; (4) the purported 12-month
breakout time is ineffective, since, unless Iran breaks out openly, we will not
even know when the clock begins, and months will go by while the U.S. debates
internally what to do; and (5) Iran is permitted to continue work on long-range
ballistic missiles that have no use other than eventual deployment of nuclear
weapons. His conclusion is stark:
[The deal] assumes that permitting Iran a large‐scale
enrichment capability is compatible with the goal of denying Iran the ability
to produce weapons‐grade fissile material; it assumes that the twelve month
breakout time is meaningful; it assumes that the agreement will be effectively
verifiable; and it assumes that the United States and the international
community will respond to evidence of cheating before Iran can mate a nuclear
weapon to a ballistic missile. None of these assumptions holds up under scrutiny. As
a result, the threat to the U.S. homeland and to our NATO allies of an Iran
armed with nuclear tipped ballistic missiles will increase not decrease under
the anticipated agreement. [Emphasis added].
And that is even before considering the risks of
proliferation in the region, the existential threat to Israel, seriously frayed
relations with Arab allies, and the vastly increased resources for Iran and its
allies to establish a game-changing hegemony in a vital strategic area of the
world.
Amb. Joseph is not simply an independent expert but one with
considerable real-world experience, not only with Libya but with the North
Korean fiasco. He testified Tuesday that in 2003 the United States insisted
upon and got “anytime, anywhere” inspections in Libya — to all sites, declared
and undeclared. It is a shame that Secretary of State Kerry never heard of such
things before he went and negotiated an extraordinarily bad deal. Any senator
who reads Amb. Joseph’s written testimony or listens to his answers
to the committee’s questions will have a difficult time justifying a vote
in favor of what Kerry brought back.
#TakingBackAmerica #IranDeal #WakeUpAmerica #StopIranNow
No comments:
Post a Comment