United We Stand - Upholding Rule Of Law - Defending America's Freedoms

“UNITED WE STAND Upholding Rule Of Law” AND "Defending America's Freedoms" is for (A.); any American in the world with a Conservative (Republican) point of view. AND (B.); any Filipino in the world who is Dissatisfied with the current Governmental Administration. I am Proudly American with ties to many High Officials in the Philippines as well to some in the United States. VISIT THE (2) FACE BOOK GROUPS AND - LET YOUR VOICE BE HEARD!

Friday, July 31, 2015

BBL & THE UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS- RESPECT TO THE UNLAWFUL & UNCONSTITUTIONAL BBL UNDER SHARIAH LAW

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

MAR ROXAS- SECRETARY OF D.I.L.G.- "INCOMPETENCE AT ITS BEST"

WAKE UP PHILIPPINES!- I DONT LIKE YOU MARMAR!

Remember little mar mar.... I told you I didnt forget about you! NOW IS YOUR TIME NAMAN!... I start NOW!

WE KNOW that the government under the LIBERAL PARTY will not initiate to help out towns or provinces whose leaders are not their ally because they feel jeopardized if they help those who are not in their party list. We saw this in Zamboanga.... and we surely saw this in Tachloban with the Catastrophic Typhoon Yolanda..... where DILG Secretary Mar Roxas Laughed and "Blamed The Over 20,000 Deaths On Themselves" then SMILED....... as he and the YELLOW THUG CLAN had their propaganda day handing out food and supplies to all in need AND..... lets NOT Forget The SAF Who Died For Their Country, That I Am Almost Sure Mar Roxas Knew What Was Happening And Should Be Held ACCOUNTABLE!..... THIS IS A MAN WHO IS MAYBE WORSE THAN AQUINO.... DO NOT ALLOW THIS MAN TO BE PRESIDENT OF THE PHILIPPINES- I will do my """BEST""" to show the ""WORLD""... WHO YOU REALLY ARE AS A MAN!- NOTHING!
‪#‎WakeUpPhilippines‬ ‪#‎NoToMarRoxas‬ @AguilaFreedom

Wednesday, July 22, 2015

RENE SAGUISAG & THE UNLAWFUL BBL- PART #4 "MALICIOUS PROSECUTION - MALICE USE OF PROCESS"

BBL- BANGSAMORO BASIC LAW IS UNLAWFUL & UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND VIOLATES PHILIPPINE SOVEREIGNTY- PART #4 - "MALICIOUS PROSECUTION - MALICE USE OF PROCESS" USED BY RENE SAGUISAG

MR. RENE SAGUISAG THINKS HE IS ABOVE THE LAW

Mr Rene Saguisag seems to think, he as well as the yellow Aquino clan are "above the law" and they are NOT. Times have changed, where the PEOPLE (as well as myself helping them) "won't allow corruption to continue"...The law IS the law.... I was one of the first who publicly said that the BBL is treasonous.... others followed, and here is why. for those who dont know the truth.... I am here to make sure you do, because facts are truth, and TRUTH remains unchanged.

Mr Saguisag is AGAINST two congressmen who have filed a case of treason and inciting to sedition against the government officials who crafted and are pushing the proposed Bangsamoro Basic law!

Mr Saguisag filed a formal complaint against party-list Congressmen Lito Atienza and Jonathan dela Cruz – that he is the lawyer of the respondents. Yes, Saguisag has declared before the Manila prosecutor’s office that he is representing Secretary of the Peace Process Teresita Deles, government negotiating panel chairman Miriam Coronel Ferrer, Supreme Court Associate Justice Mario Victor Leonen (who is being charged as the original state representative in the negotiations with the Moro Islamic Liberation Front) and the other respondents.

Mr Saguisag has appeared as lawyer twice for Deles et al. before the fiscal’s office, which has appointed a panel of three prosecutors to handle the very serious case filed by Atienza, Dela Cruz, lawyer Jeremy Gatdula and former Ambassador Jose Romero. And publicly Mr saguisag in his column accusing the complainants of “prosecutorial terrorism,”??? he is out of his mind! he only mentions that he has “no purely personal stake [in] the matter.”

Saguisag said he has also filed a formal complaint before Speaker Feliciano Belmonte Jr. against the two congressmen for taking the government’s peace negotiators to court. I have not had the pleasure of reading the complaint, but nowhere is the fact that Saguisag is the lawyer of Deles and the others mentioned in all the reports on his complaint to the speaker that I have read.

There is problem with Saguisag calling the filing of charges against Deles and the others a case of “prosecutorial terrorism.” I think what Saguisag means is that Atienza and Dela Cruz should not have gone to court because they are already congressmen and should have merely contented themselves with voting on the measure when the opportunity arises in the House plenary. But nevertheless…. It IS TREASON…. And they have the legal capacity to file charges thereof !

Mr Rene Saguisag let me kindly remind you! you can not support or endorse terrorism, an Islamic terrorist sub-state run by a known terrorist faction that denies sovereignty to state and seem to think you have the right to defend those who unlawfully endorsed it! There are international laws that state must adhere to.... and besides that there is the 1987 Philippine Constitution... the BBL IS unlawful and unconstitutional, and any government official who supports its enactment thereof can be held liable for TREASON.... that includes the 50 named congressmen who unlawfully voted while seated for and on official business thereof! You can NOT just come along and try to do whatsoever you want to do just because it is a Philippine Government Official norm! your WRONG! Just who the hell do you think you are!- I will put you in place and the world will know!

Mr Rene Saguisag is a lawyer??? good then understand all of this: The Bbl- Bangsamoro
Basic Law Is Unconstitutional And Violates Philippine Sovereignty- Any
Government Official Who Violates The Constitution And Supports This Unlawful
Act Can Be Held Liable For Treason!!!

Supreme Court Of The
Republic Of The Philippines Is Asked To Nullify And Void The Bbl.

Shortly Before March 11th, 2015 I, Myself Called On The Supreme Court With Respect To The Unlawful And Unconstitutional Bbl, Bangsamoro Basic Law Which Reads…… “There Must Be An "Injunction Placed Against The B.B.L.".... I Am Calling On The
Supreme Power Of The Land And For Her People Of The Republic Of The Philippines
For The Supreme Court To Lawfully Place A Temporary Injunction On The B.B.L.
Whereas By Doing So, The Legalities Can Be Reviewed And Will Be Able To Withdraw
The B.B.L. From Enactment Thereof.”

House Bill 4994,

Bangsamoro Basic Law ( Bbl ) Is Presented By Its Proponents With Lofty Ideals
And Declarations That Seem To Support Democracy, Social Justice, Sustain
Development And Promote Equitable Progress In Mindanao. Upon Reviewing The
Specific Provisions And Analyzing The Essence Of The Proposed Legislation,
However, Brought Serious Doubts And Fear For Our Country And People. Contradictory
And Treacherous Provisions Are Evident In The Legislation Leading To The
Creation Of An Authoritarian Bangsamoro Islamic Sub-State, Run By A Known
Terrorist Faction With An Expansionist And Secessionist Agenda. The Bbl Is
Strongly Supported And Propagandized By The Aquino Administration In The Name
Of "Peace", And Labeling Oppositions As "Anti-Peace" And "Anti-Muslim" Which Is Far From The Truth. While Veiling The Provisions And Strategic Directions Of The Malaysian-Designed Bangsamoro
Islamic Sub-State Operated By The Moro Islamic Liberation Front ( Milf ), For Eventual And Seamless Integration With The Federation Of Malaysia.How Can Members Of Congress Take An Oath To "Protect The Constitution From All Enemies And Protect The Sovereignty Of State" ……Then Willfully, And Knowingly Vote On Laws Which Are Unconstitutional And Gut The Rule Of Law Thereof And Without Any Judicial Oversight; And Yet Not Be Charged With Treason When The 23 Milf And Philippine Government Negotiators Will Be Charged With Treason.

It Seems To Me That Their Oath To Protect, Combined With Their Acts To Destroy, Or Damage The Very Thing They Took An Oath To Protect Is The Very Definition Of Treason.
Whereas: The Provisions Of The Unlawful Bbl- Bangsamoro Basic Law Were In Effect “Copied” From The Invalid Moa-Ad… Furthermore, Which The Supreme Court Had Already Declared “Unconstitutional”! With That Being Said And A Well Known Fact Already In Place;-
Whereas: Congressmen And Women Asked By The Aquino Administration To Deliberate And Pass An “Unlawful Bill Into Congress”, The Bbl- Bangsamoro Basic Law Which Makes An "Artificial Sub-State" Run By A Known Terrorist Faction And Gives Up Territory Of The Philippines And Were On Duty And Seated For "Official Business" When They "Willfully” Voted For The Unlawful Bangsamoro Basic Law And Did So With A Total Disregard For The Constitution Of The Republic Of The Philippines, Which Is The Basis For The Laws And Statues For The Republic Of The Philippines, Hence By Doing So On "Official Business", - Therefore, Committed Treason"

By the way Mr Rene Saguisag, your an Attorney correct? .........guess what! I know Law so well also!.. one thing you forgot or just dont care about because you're so used to the corruption, is the statue of "malice use of process or abuse of process" ie "malicious prosecution". whereas "refers to the improper use of a civil or criminal legal procedure for deliberate malice, malicious, It is the malicious and deliberate misuse of regularly issued civil or criminal court process that is not justified by the underlying legal action."..... you can NOT just do as you want to THINK you can get away with it! Especially being an attorney you already know that YOU ARE NOT ABOVE THE LAW

#NOtoBBL #BBL #MILF @AguilaFreedom

BBL- BANGSAMORO BASIC LAW IS UNLAWFUL & UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND VIOLATES PHILIPPINE SOVEREIGNTY- PART #3 - TO DENY SOVEREIGNTY & LIABLE FOR TREASON

THE BBL- BANGSAMOROBASIC LAW IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND VIOLATES PHILIPPINE SOVEREIGNTY- ANYGOVERNMENT OFFICIAL WHO VIOLATES THE CONSTITUTION AND SUPPORTS THIS UNLAWFULACT CAN BE HELD LIABLE FOR TREASON!!!

SUPREME COURT OF THEREPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES IS ASKED TO NULLIFY AND VOID THE BBL.

Shortly Before March11th, 2015 I, Myself called on the Supreme Court with respect to the Unlawful and Unconstitutional BBL, Bangsamoro Basic Law which reads…… “There MUST BE an"INJUNCTION PLACED AGAINST THE B.B.L.".... I Am Calling On The Supreme Power Of The Land and For Her People Of The Republic Of The Philippines For The Supreme Court To LAWFULLY Place A Temporary Injunction On The B.B.L.Whereas By Doing So, The Legalities Can Be Reviewed And Will Be Able To WithdrawThe B.B.L. From Enactment Thereof.”

UPHOLDING RULE OF LAW- LIABLE FOR TREASON

House Bill 4994,Bangsamoro Basic Law ( BBL ) is presented by its proponents with lofty idealsand declarations that seem to support democracy, social justice, sustain development and promote equitable progress in Mindanao. Upon reviewing the specific provisions and analyzing the essence of the proposed legislation,however, brought serious doubts and fear for our country and people. Contradictory and treacherous provisions are evident in the legislation leading to the creation of an authoritarian Bangsamoro Islamic sub-state, run by a known terrorist faction with an expansionist and secessionist agenda. The BBL is strongly supported and propagandized by the Aquino administration in the name of "peace", and labeling oppositions as "anti-peace" and"anti-Muslim" which is far from the truth. While veiling the provisions and strategic directions of the Malaysian-designed BangsamoroIslamic sub-state operated by the Moro Islamic Liberation Front ( MILF ), for eventual and seamless integration with the Federation of Malaysia.

How can members of Congress take an oath to "PROTECT THE CONSTITUTION FROM ALL ENEMIES AND PROTECT THE SOVEREIGNTY OF STATE" ……then willfully, and knowingly vote on laws which are unconstitutional and gut the rule of law thereof and without any judicial oversight; and yet NOT be charged with treason when the 23 MILF and Philippine Government Negotiators will be charged with Treason.

It seems to me that their Oath to protect, combined with their Acts to destroy, or damage the very thing they took an oath to protect is the very definition of treason.

WHEREAS: The Provisions of The Unlawful BBL- Bangsamoro Basic Law were in effect “copied”From The Invalid MOA-AD… Furthermore, which the Supreme Court had already declared “Unconstitutional”! With that being said and a well known fact already in place;-

WHEREAS: Congressmen And Women Asked By The Aquino Administration To Deliberate And Pass An“Unlawful Bill Into Congress”, The BBL- Bangsamoro Basic Law Which Makes An"Artificial Sub-State" Run By A Known Terrorist Faction And Gives Up Territory Of The Philippines And Were On Duty And Seated For "Official Business" When They "Willfully” Voted For The Unlawful Bangsamoro Basic Law And Did So With A Total Disregard For The Constitution Of The Republic Of The Philippines, Which Is The Basis For The Laws And Statues For The Republic Of The Philippines, Hence By Doing So On "Official Business",- Therefore, Committed Treason"

Summary of the BBL Articles in question:

Preamble

Article I Section 3

Article II Section 3

Article III Sections 2 and 3

Article IV Sections 1,2, and 3

Article V Sections 3(29), (34), (57) and 4

Article VI Sections 4 and 9

Article VII Sections 1, 3, and 30

Article VIII Section 4

Article X

Article XI Sections 1,2, 3, and 4

Article XII Sections 2 and 10

These articles violate the Philippine Constitution and the Sovereignty Of State

*The 50 Congressmen who willfully and knowingly voted for the Unconstitutional and highly Unlawful BBL, dismantling the Sovereignty Of State are as follows and SHOULD ALSO BE HELD LIABLE FOR TREASON THEREOF:

Abad, Henedina(Batanes)

Acop, Romeo (AntipoloCity 2nd district)

Acosta- Alba,Ma. Lourdes(Bukidnon 1st district)

Adiong, Ansaruddin(Lanao del Sur 1st district)

Almonte, Jorge(Misamis Occidental 1st district)

Amatong, Isagani(Zamboanga del Norte 3rd district)

Amatong, Rommel(Compostela Valley 2nd district)

Arbison, Naryam Napii(Sulu 2nd district)

Bag-ao, Kaka (DinagatIslands)

Balindong,Pangalian (Lanao del Sur 2nd district)

Banal, Jorge (QuezonCity 3rd district)

Barzaga, Elpidio Jr.(Cavite 4th district)

Belmonte, JoseChristopher (Quezon City 6th district)

Biazon, Rodolfo(Muntinlupa City)

Cabilao, Belma(Zamboanga Sibugay 1st district)

Dimaporo, ImeldaQuibranza (Lanao del Norte 1st district)

Ermita-Buhain, ElenitaMiagros (Batangas 1st district)

Fariñas, Rodolfo (Ilocos Norte 1st district)

Garay, Florencio(Surigao del Sur 2nd district)

Garcia-Albano, Mylene(Davao City 2nd district)

Gonzales, Neptali II(Mandaluyong City)

Gutierrez,Ibarra III (Akbayan Party-list)

Hataman-Salliman,Jim (Basilan)

Hofer, Ann (Zamboanga Sibugay 2nd district)

Katoh, AngelinaLudovice (Akbayan Party -list)

Labadlad,Rosendo (Zamboanga del Norte 2nd district)

Lagdameo,Antonio Jr (Davao del Norte 2nd district)

Loong, Tupay (Sulu 1st district)

Mangundadatu,Zajid (Maguindanao 2nd district)

Masongsong, Edgar(1-CARE Party -list)

Matugas, Francisco (Surigao del Norte 1st district)

Mendoza, RaymondDemocrito (TUCP)

Oaminal, Henry(Misamis Occidental 2nd district)

Piamonte,Mariano Jr (A Teacher Party-list)

Robredo, Maria LeonorGerona (Camarines Sur 3rd district)

Quimbo, Romero (Marikina City 2nd district)

Rodriguez,Maximo (Abante Mindanao)

Rodriguez, Rufus(Cagayan de Oro 2nd district)

Romarate,Guillermo Jr (Surigao del Norte 2nd district)

Romualdo, XavierJesus (Camiguin)

Sacdalan, Jesus (North Cotabato 1st district)

Sahali, Ruby (Tawi-Tawi)

Sakaluran, Raden (Sultan Kudarat 1st district)

Sarmiento, MelSenen (Western Samar 1st district)

Sema, Bai Sandra(Maguindanao and Cotabato City 1st district)

Teodoro,Marcelino (Marikina City 1st district)

Turabin-Hataman, SittiDjalia (AMIN Party-list)

Tupas, Niel Jr (Iloilo5th district)

Ungab, Isidro (Davao City 3rd district)

Uy, Juliette (Misamis Oriental 2nd district)

SUMMARY

1987 CONSTITUTION Article II Section 1. The Philippines is a democratic and republican State.Sovereignty resides in the people and all government authority emanates from them.

The Filipino people do not authorize anyone in government to sell the sovereignty of their country to anyone nor do they authorize the government to parcel out any land that is a part of the National Territory of the Republic of the Philippines and give sovereignty to aliens especially a known terrorist organization / faction whose members do not even call themselves Filipinos and who are guilty of murdering the men of a duly constituted authority, PNP, and who have committed several acts of terrorism in the Republic of the Philippines. The peace process between the government and the MILF is definitely a pretext by both parties for their own selfish gains to scam the Filipino people in toto. All government officials, elective and appointive,pushing the BBL become co-conspirators of this SCAM and are guilty of high treason for depriving the Filipino people of their Sovereignty.

12 REASONS TO OPPOSE THE BANGSAMORO BASIC LAW ( BBL ):

House Bill 4994, Bangsamoro Basic Law ( BBL ) is presented by its proponents with lofty ideals and declarations that seem to support democracy, social justice, sustain development and promote equitable progress in Mindanao. Upon reviewing the specific provisions and analyzing the essence of the proposed legislation, however, brought serious doubts and fear for the country and people. Contradictory and treacherous provisions are evident in the legislation leading to the creation of an authoritarian Bangsamoro Islamic sub-state,with an expansionist and secessionist agenda. The BBL is strongly supported and propagandized by the Aquino administration in the name of "peace",and labeling oppositions as "anti-peace" and "anti-Muslim"which is far from the truth. While veiling the provisions and strategic directions of the Malaysian-designed Bangsamoro Islamic sub-state operated bythe Moro Islamic Liberation Front ( MILF ), for eventual and seamless integration with the Federation of Malaysia.

1. MALAYSIAN DESIGN OF BANGSAMORO SUB-STATE

The Bangsamoro Basic Law ( BBL ) prescribes a parliamentary form of government patterned after the Federation of Malaysia. Bangsamoro is distinct from the presidential form of government, existing laws and regional structure of the Republic of the Philippines. The proposed law will lead to the creation of a Bangsamoro Islamic sub-state that could eventually integrate with the Federation of Malaysia, in the same manner the contested territory of Sabah was incorporated in 1964. BBL is a clear and present danger to the Republic, to our national sovereignty and territorial integrity. The bill currently being deliberated in Congress will endanger the national security, interest and welfare of the Republic of the Philippines and the Filipino people. The passage of BBL into law will reward an armed insurgent group; the MILF and its Malaysian backer, with a large territory plus tens of billions of pesos of Filipino taxpayers money. The Aquino government is yielding undue concessions to the MILF, after conspiring with Malaysia to initiate destabilization campaigns that resulted to thousands of deaths, economic dislocation and strategically preventing the Philippines from asserting its sovereignty,territorial and proprietary rights of Filipino citizens in the contested territory of Sabah.

2. INDEPENDENT BANGSAMORO GOVERNMENT OFFICES

The Bangsamoro will create independent government institutions, commissions and agencies particularly legislative and judicial institutions and systems; revenue and taxation, audit, election and civil service commissions. Over fifty ( 50 ) departments and agencies, including land registration and customs, police force and coast guard will be organized by the Bangsamoro government.The provision for reserved and shared governance in favor of the Bangsamoro, abrogates the power of the Philippine state to effective lygovern the Bangsamoro territory. What guarantees and qualifications could the Bangsamoro harness to improve the quality of governance and justify the replacement of National Government offices operating in the region? Certainly,the Bangsamoro will require a better trained bureaucracy, reform the culture and system of governance, and develop exemplary leadership to efficiently and effectively manage the affairs of the Bangsamoro government. Statecraft as we know cannot be learned overnight, moreso when the new players are subjected to a new operating environment, challenges and undermined management qualifications. The result will surely be chaotic, if not result into a break down in law and order and governance. Furthermore, the Bangsamoro is given entitlements to top positions in the Philippine government hierarchy without reciprocity.

3. BANGSAMORO CHIEF MINISTER AS HEAD OF STATE

The Bangsamoro will be headed by the Chief Minister, who is mandated to exercise supreme, almost absolute power over the legislative,executive and judicial branches of government through the operation of law,political design and controls. The authority to exercise power emanates from the legislative branch composed initially of MILF appointees and applied accordingly in executive and judicial offices in unbriddled capacity. The powers include appointment of officials, administrative and budgetary controls,accountability and attrition proceedings. Under the BBL, the Chief Minister is mandated to exercise asymmetric relationship with the President of the Republic of the Philippines as head of state. He will have effective control of intergovernmental conflict resolution mechanism and limit the movement of Armed Forces of the Philippines ( AFP ) in the Bangsamoro territory, rendering thesame inutile to defend the national security and interest of the Philippine state as circumstances arise.

4. MILF AS TRANSITION AUTHORITY

The Moro Islamic Liberation Front ( MILF ), an armed minority that broke away from the mainstream Moro National Liberation Front (MNLF ) is designated to assume supreme leadership status during the transition process. The expanded Autonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao ( ARMM ) will be reorganized as the Bangsamoro Islamic sub-state. The one ( 1 ) year transition time frame is extendable for an indefinite period with the MILF leadership atthe helm. The MILF will initially receive P 10-Billion in capital outlay from the Filipino taxpayers. The total budget to be allocated will be more than P75-Billion over a period of ten ( 10 ) years.

5. BANGSAMORO TERRITORY AND EXPANSIONISM

The proposed Bangsamoro territory will include the ARMM provinces of Basilan, Lanao del Sur, Maguindanao, Sulu and Tawi-Tawi; the cities of Cotabato and Isabela, some towns and barangays in Lanao del Norte and North Cotabato province and adjacent waters. The proposed Bangsamoro territory is home to about four ( 4 ) million Filipino citizens: Muslims, Christians and Lumads. A provision mandating territorial expansion by integrating contiguous Local Goverment Units ( LGUs ), through petitions representing 10% of the electorates will start the process of integration. The one-way territorial expansion provision will create a constant state of siege, intensify conflict and perceived danger to contiguous LGUs and the entire island of Mindanao.

6. ILLEGITIMACY OF MILF REPRESENTATION

The Corrupted Benigno C. Aquino III administration peace process negotiation was initiated exclusively with a faction of the MoroIslamic Liberation Front ( MILF ). The MILF undermines the legitimacy of the peace process negotiation being a minority group that does not represent thetrue aspirations of the people of Mindanao. The appointment of alleged terrorist-bomber alias "Mohagher Iqbal" as the official representative and negotiator of the MILF does not bring justice and further create doubts to the legitimacy of the "peace" process. Aquino's negotiators; namely Madame Teresita Quintos-Deles and Miriam Coronel-Ferrer act more like lawyers of the MILF, rather than representatives of the Philippine government and the Filipino people as observed by the public. Inexplicably,long standing leaders and representatives of Filipino citizens in Mindanao were excluded in the peace negotiation process. The Royal Hashemite Sultanate of Sabah and Sulu, the Royal Houses of Lanao and Maguindanao, the MNLF andfactions of MILF were excluded and have no meaningful representation in the socalled peace process negotiations, that led to the formulation of BBL. The negotiation process itself is defective, given the interstate nature of the proceedings, with a sovereign status erroneously considered for the MILF. The Philippine Senate is constitutionally mandated as the primary institution to undertake such task.

7. SHARI'AH LAW IN BANGSAMORO JUSTICE SYSTEM

Under Article X of BBL, the Bangsamoro government will adopt the Shari'ah law in the justice system, with far reaching judicial reach involving civil and family, commercial and criminal matters. While it is declared to be applicable to Muslims only, such prescription is unrealistic given the diverse religious and cultural beliefs of probable litigants in the territory. The integration of Shari'ah law and traditional indigenous practices will create an unprecedented conflict of laws and judicial issues with existing Philippine laws and jurisprudence. The complexity will create serious obstacles resulting to inefficient delivery of justice and unequal protection of laws between Muslims and non-Muslims, man and woman, other than issues on jurisdiction. Penalties will likely involve harsh and unusual punishments contrary to existing laws, while the institutions of marriage and family,tolerance of other religious beliefs, contemporary understanding of gay rights,commercial and financial transactions will face severe challenges under Shari'ah law. The universal doctrines of separation of Church and State, and Equal Protection of Laws will be utterly violated. The Bangsamoro High Court apparently will be supreme in addressing judiciable issues, practically relegating the Supreme Court of the Philippines to ceremonial duties and may end up upholding the Bangsamoro High Courts decisions due to technicalities.

8. BANGSAMORO POLICE AND COAST GUARD

Article XI of the BBL mandates the creation of an operationally independent police force for law enforcement and regional security. While the Bangsamoro police is referred to as part of the PNP,pertinent provisions indicate the same as operationally independent, organized and administered, and funded according to the requirements of the Bangsamoro leadership. The Bangsamoro Napolcom composition and review mechanism is subject to the temperament of the Bangsamoro leadership. A Bangsamoro Coast Guard shall likewise be organized to enforce the maritime rights, interest and security of the Bangsamoro in the proposed territorial waters. BBL defines territorial water boundaries between the Bangsamoro and contiguous LGUs in favor of the former. The creation of distinct territorial water boundaries and designated role of the Bangsamoro Coast Guard in the enforcement of exclusive fishery and maritime rights will unnecessarily cause conflicts in our fishing and maritime sectors. A new arena in naval warfare will likely ensue and serve as rationale for developing a more capable Bangsamoro Coast Guard or Navy. Given the track record of the MILF, the history of Malaysian interference and real motivation in Mindanao. The prospect of developing the capability and function of the Bangsamoro police and coast guard, into a full-pledged military and naval force with Malaysian support is highly probable. The massacre of SAF 44 in Mamasapano is fair warning and a clear indication of things to come, should we fail to recognize their supreme sacrifice and collectively oppose the passage of BBL.The operation of AFP in the territory is legally controlled by the Bangsamoro government under the BBL.

9. COST OF BBL TO FILIPINO TAXPAYERS: P 75-BILLION

The direct cost of the proposed Bangsamoro Basic Law ( BBL )to Filipino taxpayers is estimated at more than P 75-Billion over a period of10 years. Some economic analysts bring the cost of BBL to the nation at over P500-Billion. An initial P 10-Billion is allocated for capital outlay during the transition period, under the sole management of the MILF. The Bangsamoro is likewise mandated to contract commercial and foreign loans, enter into international trade agreements, manage the barter trade, develop freeports,accept foreign grants and aid, possibly including police/military aid from rival countries like Malaysia.

10. FOREIGN INTERVENTION FOR THE PASSAGE OF BBL

The most alarming situation faced by our challenged Republicis the intervention of rival states and international institutions likeMalaysia and the Organization of Islamic Countries ( OIC ) in our domestic affairs. In the case of Malaysia, naivete should not preclude us from identifying the unsettled issues of sovereignty, territorial and proprietory rights in Sabah as the real motivation of Malaysian interest in the Aquino-MILF"peace" process. Historians allege the compromised position of Aquino as reciprocity to Malaysian support, contracted since the onset of the Marcos regime. The allegation of Malaysian money being made available, purposely to bribe Filipino legislators for the passage of the BBL is a serious concern for all citizens of the Republic of the Philippines, honorable members of Congress,defense-military and police establishments. The rise of radical Islam and terrorism worldwide is a serious threat that requires equally strong measures,to prevent any part of Philippines from becoming a staging ground of this growing malady to the civilized world.

11. ARMM IS THE SOLUTION, NOT BBL

The Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao ( ARMM ) organized under the auspices of the 1987 Constitution and given focus during the Ramos administration is work in progress. It is hypocritical and self-serving to declare the ARMM as a failed experiment, to justify the imposition of an unconstitutional and dangerous BBL. An improved and better managed ARMM, with increased budget allocation remains as the most viable and non-controversial solution to advance peace, sustain development and equitable progress in the troubled regions of Central Mindanao and Sulu archipelago. The BBL is a prescription for political, social and economic instability; it has intensified conflict and the prospect of war in Mindanao unnecessarily. It must be junked the sooner, the better by Congress. Otherwise the concerned citizenry,particularly those in the affected areas must organize and campaign against the BBL in the plebiscite. Finally, the constitutionalist among us must work extra hard to declare the BBL as unconstitutional by the Supreme Court. The ARMM elections which were cancelled by Noynoy Aquino, should instead be synchronized with the 2016 National Elections, to enable the people of the region to choose their preferred representatives and legitimate leadership. A fresh start to advance a just and lasting peace for all peoples of Mindanao can begin without the flawed and compromised position of the Aquino administration, the constitutional infirmities, complexities and dangers associated with the BBL.

12. BBL IS A CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER TO THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES

The BBL is a clear and present danger to the sovereignty,security and territorial integrity of the Republic of the Philippines. The lopsided legislation threatens the national interest and welfare of the Filipino people. By all indications and policy standards, BBL is the product of a mentally challenged and psychologically unstable national leadership. Wherein world history could you find the leadership of a sovereign state yielding to unreasonable and conflicting demands of a fractitious minority? Willfully allowing a rival state to prop-up the enemy, to endanger its national security and interest? Only in the Philippines, under the leadership of His Excellency President Benigno C. Aquino III! While we fully support efforts to achieve a just and lasting peace, sustain development and promote equitable progress in Mindanao, the cost of peace should not compromise our national interest and security, the people's freedom and welfare, and our way of life as a secular,egalitarian, sovereign and democratic state.

The compromised position taken by the unpatriotic and incompetent Aquino administration must be opposed by all Filipino citizens,regardless of faith and creed. We must unite and stand up against the impostors and traitors to our Republic. We must take action now by studying the unconstitutional and dangerous provisions of the BBL, share this with other concerned citizens, civil society groups, people's organizations and patriotic officials in all levels of government. Contact and press your Congressmen and Senators to junk the BBL. Organize, make a list of traitors and take action now before its too late.

NO TO BBL ! NO TO AN ISLAMIC SUB-STATE !

"BBL will not lead to peace. BBL will lead to war - if not by the MILF-BIFF who actually never let up, or by those who were deliberately left out of the conversation (and they are legion) as with the Abu Sayyaf who have worked hand in hand with the MILF but also have close ties to ISIS. And you will reap the whirlwind. So, my advice is - don't push it; stop,look and listen; reverse course; change your advisers; and try the inclusive and transparent track. In short, proceed with extreme caution and talk to the right parties because our national security is at stake here."

Aguila Freedom

#NOtoBBL #BBL #MILF @AguilaFreedom

BBL- BANGSAMORO BASIC LAW IS UNLAWFUL & UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND VIOLATES PHILIPPINE SOVEREIGNTY- PART #2 – SC ASKED TO NULLIFY BBL

THE UNLAWFUL &UNCONSTITUTIONAL BBL- BANGSAMORO BASIC LAW - PART #2- SUPREME COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES IS ASKED TO NULLIFY AND VOID THE BBL-BANGSAMORO BASIC LAW

SUPREME COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES IS ASKED TO NULLIFY AND VOID THE BBL- BANGSAMORO BASIC LAW WHICH THE CORRUPTED MALACANANG BRANDED THE PETITION AS “BASELESS”!

Shortly Before March 11th, 2015 I, myself called on the Supreme Court with respect to the Unlawful and Unconstitutional BBL, Bangsamoro Basic Law which reads…… “There MUST BE an "INJUNCTION PLACED AGAINST THE B.B.L.".... I Am Calling On The Supreme Power Of The Land and For Her People Of The Republic Of The Philippines For The Supreme Court To LAWFULLY Place A Temporary Injunction On The B.B.L. Whereas By Doing So, The Legalities Can Be Reviewed And Will Be Able To Withdraw The B.B.L. From Enactment Thereof.”

THE BBL- BANGSAMORO BASIC LAW IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND VIOLATES PHILIPPINE SOVEREIGNTY- ANY GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL WHO VIOLATES THE CONSTITUTION AND SUPPORTS THIS UNLAWFUL ACT CAN BE HELD LIABLE FOR TREASON!!!

“The Supreme Court Needs To Show Its Integrity And Place AnInjunction On The Enactment Of The Unlawful BBL Thereof.”

SUPREME COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES IS ASKED TONULLIFY AND VOID THE BBL- BANGSAMORO BASIC LAW

Former National Security Adviser Norberto Gonzales, Bishop Romulo Dela Cruz, Leyte Rep. Ferdinand Martin Romualdez, Former Senator KitTatad, Archbishop Fernando Capalla And Former Justice Manuel Lazaro File APetition To Review The Draft Bangsamoro Basic Law Before The Supreme Court.

MANILA, Philippines - The Supreme Court (SC) was asked yesterdayto void the agreement forged by the government with the Moro Islamic (MILF) for the proposed creation of a Bangsamoro entity in southern Philippines.

Petitioners Philippine Constitution Association (Philconsa) and former Negros Oriental representative Jacinto Paras asked the high court todeclare unconstitutional the Comprehensive Agreement on the Bangsamoro (CAB),including the earlier Framework Agreement on the Bangsamoro (FAB) and its annexes.

Both alleged that the government peace panel committed grave abuse of discretion in signing the FAB and CAB on Oct. 12, 2012 and March 27,2014, respectively, as both are mere revivals of the Memorandum of Agreement on Ancestral Domain (MOA-AD) forged by the previous administration with the MILF and which was declared unconstitutional by the high court in October 2008.

Moro National Liberation Front (MNLF) spokesman Emmanuel Fontanilla welcomed the filing of the petition, saying the CAB will abrogatethe 1996 peace accord, which was brokered by the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC).

“It’s a welcome development as this will highlight our position that the CAB runs counter to the provision of the Constitution,” Fontanilla told The STAR in a telephone interview.

He added that CAB is a betrayal of the 1996 agreement of the government and the MNLF because it deals with the same people and territory,recalling that the government abandoned the older agreement in its final stages.

Malacañang, which has repeatedly called for the passage of the Bangsamoro Basic Law (BBL), questioned the timing of the petition and branded it as baseless.

“The government will be ready to answer once the Supreme Court directs us to do so. It is interesting that these challenges to the FAB and CAB come at this time,” deputy presidential spokesperson Abigail Valte said.

She described the timing as “quite odd” because the FAB and CAB were signed in2012 and 2014, respectively.

She added that it was baseless to claim that the MILF would be receiving “humongous social, financial and political benefits” after the BBL’s passage.

“Using the word humongous was being hyperbolic and meant to skewthe opinion of the public against the BBL,” Valte also said.

Leyte Rep. Ferdinand Martin Romualdez, leader of the House’s independent bloc and Philconsa president, said they are merely making sure that the BBL is consistent with the Constitution and contains no legal infirmities.

He reiterated his support for genuine peace in Mindanao “that can only be ensured if the BBL is legal and constitutional.”

VOID MEASURE:
In its 24-page petition, Philconsa argued that the agreements violated Article X Section 1 of the Constitution, which authorizes and recognizes only five territorial and political subdivisions – provinces, cities, municipalities,barangays and autonomous regions.
The group pointed out that the power to create the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao (ARMM) was vested only in the First Congress under the 1987 Constitution.

“We submit that without the prior constitutional amendments, the FAB proposal to establish the Bangsamoro to replace the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao as the New Political Entity (NPE) is unconstitutional and void,” it argued.

The group also reasoned that “axiomatically, all subsequent acts/issuances arising from, connected with or related to the FAB and CAB, such as the draft House Bill 4994 (or BBL), are odious and treacherous violations oft he 1987 Constitution.”

Joined by former senator Francisco Tatad, former national security adviser Norberto Gonzales and archbishops Ramon Arguelles of Lipa,Fernando Capalla of Davao and Romulo de la Cruz of Zamboanga, the Philconsa argued that FAB and CAB granted concessions to the MILF beyond the powers ofthe President and in violation of the provisions of the Constitution and existing laws.

“The FAB and CAB made a real and actual commitment to fully implement their letter and spirit by effecting the necessary amendments to the Constitution and existing laws. Lamentably, respondents (officials of the peacepanel) in their official and personal capacities had neither power norauthority to commit the government to statutory changes,” the petitioners argued.

Philconsa added that the conduct of the peace process with theMILF violated Executive Order No. 125, as issued by former President Fidel Ramos, which requires the presence of a panel of advisers composed of one each from the Senate, the House of Representatives and the Cabinet to be designated by the President.

“Contrary to and in violation of EO 125, the GPNP (GovernmentPeace Negotiating Panel) were not assisted by the panel of advisers. Thedifferent GPNPs conducted numerous negotiations, dialogues and face-to-facediscussions with the MILF here and abroad, bereft of the presence of the requisite panel of advisers,” the group concluded.

Apart from voiding the CAB and FAB, Philconsa also asked the high court to issue a temporary restraining order (TRO) enjoining the implementation of the two agreements and the allotment of funds to pursue activities to implement them.

Petitioners sought to enjoin the implementation of all other acts and issuances such as the BBL that are related to the FAB and CAB. They said the draft Bangsamoro Basic Law in Congress is a “fruit” of the two“unconstitutional” agreements.

Petitioners also asked the high court to issue mandamus directing the Commission on Audit (COA) to disallow the audit of all funds incurred by the government peace panel.

Named respondents in the petition were former government peace panel chief and now SC Associate Justice Marvic Leonen, chief peace negotiator Miriam Coronel-Ferrer, MILF peace panel head Mohagher Iqbal, Budget Secretary Florencio Abad and the COA.

UNCONSTITUTIONAL:
Paras, for his part, alleged that CAB and FAB are unconstitutional when they defined the “territory” and “territorial waters” of the proposed Bangsamoro entity.

Article V Section 1 of FAB defines “core territory” as covering the current territory of ARMM, plus the cities of Cotabato and Isabela. ArticleV Section 4 of the FAB, on the other hand, provided for “territorial waters” of the entity.

“The term territory is an element of statehood. Article X of the 1987 Constitution allows only the creation of an autonomous region in Muslim Mindanao, not a separate state or sub-state,” he argued in 34-page petition.

Article I Section 2 of the FAB provides that “the government of the Bangsamoro shall have ministerial form,” which Paras said pertains to a parliamentary form of government.

“The Constitution contemplates a structure of government that is anything except a parliamentary government,” he stressed.

Just like Philconsa, Paras believes that the CAB and FAB were similar to MOA-AD as he pointed out that “the CAB, particularly its FAB and corresponding annexes, were negotiated and signed without any public consultation.

“This means that the herein respondents acted in a whimsical,capricious, oppressive arbitrary and despotic manner when they negotiated and caused the signing of the CAB, particularly its FAB and its corresponding annexes,” he added.

He named Ferrer, presidential adviser on the peace processTeresita Deles and other representatives of the government peace panel SenenBacani, Yasmin Busran-Lao and Mehol Sadain as respondents in his petition.

Paras did not name Leonen as a respondent, but sought his inhibition from the case.

Aguila Freedom
#NOtoBBL #BBL #MILF @AguilaFreedom

BBL- BANGSAMORO BASIC LAW IS UNLAWFUL & UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND VIOLATES PHILIPPINE SOVEREIGNTY- PART #1 – TERRORISM IN THE PHILIPPINES

President Aquino says they are NOT Terrorists…. DILG SEC. Mar Roxas says it was all just a mis-encounter, and DOJ SEC. Delima says to MILF…. Just show good faith!!!!

Acts of Terrorism are conflicts based on political issues conducted by rebel organizations against the Philippine government, its citizens and supporters. Most acts of terrorism in the country are conducted by “Radical Islamic Extremist terrorist groups”. The most active terrorist groups in the Philippines are the Moro Islamic Liberation Front, Moro National Liberation Front, Abu Sayyaf, Rajah Sulaiman Movement and Jemaah Islamiyah. Much larger than the Radical Islamic Extremist terrorist groups, the Philippine government is fighting a long running war with the Communist New People's Army, NPA.
Since January 2000 radical Islamist groups and Islamist separatist forces in the Philippines have carried out over 40 major bombings against civilians and civilian property, mostly in the southern regions of the country around Mindanao, Basilan, Jolo and other nearby islands. Numerous bombings have also been carried out in and around Metro Manila, though several hundred kilometres from the conflict in the southern regions, due to its political importance. In the period from 2000 to 2007 attacks killed nearly 400 Filipino civilians and injured well over one thousand five hundred more, more casualties than caused by bombings and other attacks in Indonesia, Morocco, Spain, Turkey, or Britain during the same period.

Public transport and other gathering places, such as street markets, have been the favored bombing targets, however large-scale abductions and shootings have also been carried out by the groups, predominantly by Abu Sayyaf and the Rajah Solaiman Movement, two groups that had claimed responsibility for most of the attacks.

I have written a few times in detail the defined definition of “Terrorism”, but again I will give a brief description, and is as follows: The definition of terrorism used is drawn from the United Nations General Assembly condemnation:

“"Criminal acts intended or calculated to provoke a state of terror in the general public, a group of persons or particular persons for political purposes are in any circumstance unjustifiable, whatever the considerations of a political, philosophical, ideological, racial, ethnic, religious or any other nature that may be invoked to justify them.”

Lets define TERRORISM TO THE “T”….. "Most of the formal definitions of terrorism have some common characteristics: a fundamental motive to make political/societal changes; the use of violence or illegal force; attacks on civilian targets by "nonstate"/"Subnational actors"; and the goal of affecting society. This finding is reflected in the listing of three components of terrorism:

1. Acts or threats of violence;
2. The communication of fear to an audience beyond the immediate victim, and;
3. Political, economic, or religious aims by the perpetrator(s)
There are multiple ways of defining terrorism, and all are subjective. Most define terrorism as "the use or threat of serious violence" to advance some kind of "cause". Some state clearly the kinds of group ("sub-national", "non-state") or cause (political, ideological, religious) to which they refer. Others merely rely on the instinct of most people when confronted with innocent civilians being killed or maimed by men armed with explosives, firearms or other weapons.

"1. Any willful act causing death or grievous bodily harm or loss of liberty to:
a) Heads of State, persons exercising the prerogatives of the head of the State, their hereditary or designated successors;
b) The wives or husbands or the above-mentioned persons;
c) Persons charged with public functions or holding public positions when the act is directed against them in their public capacity.
2. Willful destruction of, or damage to, public property or property devoted to a public purpose belonging to or subject to the authority of another High Contracting Party.
3. Any willful act calculated to endanger the lives of members of the public.
4. Any attempt to commit an offence falling within the foregoing provisions of the present article.
5. The manufacture, obtaining, possession, or supplying of arms, ammunition, explosives or harmful substances with the view to the commission in any country whatsoever o f an offence falling within the present article."

It should be well noted!….. from the 1970’s up until today….. Terrorists acts caused by “Radical Islamic Extremist Terrorist Groups” have occurred in the Republic of the Philippines in vast areas such as:

“Manila, Davao, Zamboanga City, Quiapo, Baguio, Misamis Occidental, Ipil, Jolo, Basilan, Ozamiz City, Mandaluyong City, Kabacan, Monkayo, Honda Bay, General Santos City, Kidapawan City, Quezon City, Datu Piang, Tacurong City, Carmen, Kolambugan, Koronadal City, Midsayap, Tawi Tawi, Parang, El Fraile Island, Piagapo, Lamitan City, Patikul, Jolo, Shariff Aguak, Makilala, Cotabato City, Digos City, Malabang City, Linamon, Iligan City, Isabela City, Lebak, Luuk, Sulu, Marawi City, Tubigan, Antipolo City, Isabela City, Maluso, San Pascual, Matalam, Las Navas, Makati City, Tampakan, Mangudadatu, Tungawan, Sumisip, Sibago Island, Lapuyan, Cagayan de Oro, Nunungan, Guindolongan, Bukidnon, Allacapan”!!!!
61 Locations Within The Philippines??? OH MY GOD!

WHAT THE HELL IS GOING ON HERE PEOPLE!!!!..... “TO REMAIN PASSIVE….. CHANGE WILL NEVER TAKE PLACE”…..
And NOW………….. President Aquino AND His Administration want to install the BBL! Now the Republic Of The Philippines are in “IMMINENT DANGER”

“President Aquino…. Needs to RECALCULATE the cost of breaking CONSTITUTIONAL LAW when it comes to the BANGSAMORO Peace Agreement”

“THE BANGSAMORO FEDERAL-TYPE STATE THAT THEY HAVE AGREED TO ESTABLISH IN MINDANAO IS, UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND PERHAPS BREAKS INTERNATIONAL LAW” and Malacañang has lost Her Integrity for even establishing ANY relationship between State and the notorious MILF moreso…

When President Aquino assumed office in 2010, he took a solemn oath to “PRESERVE AND DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION” which time and time again has proven to be without merit!

“Malacañang is a Government who is first to violate her laws instead of conforming to them; the first to deny her people's rights instead of honoring them; a Government who promotes anarchy and division instead of uniting together; a Government who engages in the destruction of her people's' lives and dreams, instead of protecting them and helping them to achieve their goals and ambitions”..

President Aquino exposed his doubts, despite his having authorized his negotiators to sign the Framework Agreement with the MILF on Oct. 7, 2012, when he committed Malacañang to work for the amending of the Constitution if it gets in the way. HUH????? Wow! The INCOMPETENT AQUINO GOVERNMENT forgot or didn’t care to think twice the other risks involved when breaking the Philippine Constitution….. I will remind the administration, the risks involved now that the Government willfully wants to change constitution to “kiss-the-ass” of the MILF! I strongly STRONGLY suggest that Aquino RECALCULATES risks involved and moreso the sovereignty of the Republic of the Philippines!

President Aquino deliberately ignored the pleas from the Philippine National Police-Special Action Force (PNP-SAF) for additional reinforcement to rescue trapped operatives from their dire position. The PNP said, not only was President Aquino informed beforehand of the SAF operation against Malay-sian Zulkifli bin Hir, alias “Mar-wan,” believed to be a key leader of the al-Qaeda-linked Jemaah Islam-iyah, and his alleged Filipino henchman, Abdul Basit Usman, but that he was actually on top of the operation itself.

“The President was actually monitoring the operation. Everything was being reported to him in real time, BUT when the operation went out of control as the MILF and the BIFF Bangsamoro Islamic Freedom Fighters) joined forces in attacking the SAF, the President refused to send any reinforcement even as the SAF were already crying for help from their beleaguered position”! mygod can you imagine that....

The MILF are plain terrorists…. Simply speaking and nothing else. “WHY DID PRESIDENT AQUINO SIDE WITH A TERRORIST ORGANIZATION?” ….

What is the Philippine government missing???? to negotiate with a terrorist(s ) is to allow them to have power over our actions over your state, If we were to allow a terrorist group to have power over our actions of state, then every terrorist group that wants something in the world would come at us and try to get us to give them what they want also… quite simply, YOU DON’T GIVE IN TO TERRORISTS… and The President of the Republic of the Philippines did just that when he paid them and instituted an unconstitutional law! If you give terrorists what they want, you will prove that terrorism is a successful strategy and you will encourage others to also use terrorism to get what they want. The more that terrorism is rewarded, the more terrorism we will get.

The BBL MUST NOT BE PLACED INTO LAW……
We Urge the people of the Republic of the Philippines to Lawfully Stop the Bangsamoro Law / Peace Treaty NOW! While there is still a chance for FREEDOM! And hold accountable those persons who designed the unconstitutional law and who are to enact this peace treaty.
AguilaFreedom

#NOtoBBL #BBL #MILF